ArticleClinical kidney journal2026
Screening for genetic kidney diseases in a dialysis cohort via exome sequencing.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Monogenic causes are increasingly recognized in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), but the real-world diagnostic efficacy of exome sequencing in unselected dialysis cohorts is still being defined. Methods: We conducted a prospective study enrolling 317 adult ESKD patients from a single center in Taiyuan, China, regardless of presumed etiology. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed on peripheral blood DNA. Variants were curated and classified per the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) 2015 and Association for Clinical Genomic Science (ACGS) guidelines, with only "pathogenic" or "likely pathogenic" findings considered diagnostic. Results: The cohort was 59% male, mean ESKD onset 53.2 ± 14.3 years. A definitive monogenic diagnosis emerged in 7.3% (23/317) of patients, in line with multicenter and international studies. Genes most frequently implicated were Conclusions: In a real-world Chinese dialysis cohort, WES provided a molecular diagnosis in 7.3% of cases, demonstrating clinical utility for risk stratification, family counseling, donor selection and actionable therapy. These findings underscore the need for routine integration of genetic testing in ESKD care irrespective of family history, especially to clarify ambiguous cases and optimize management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.