Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41725775›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Overcoming data collection challenges in rural settings by community engagement initiatives: reflections from the research team.

Maarthi Raja, P K Latha, Gayathri Kg, Akshaya Prem Kumar, Sarada Satyamoorthy Garg, Maroof Khan, Guda Joseph Raju, Chekuri Gangaraju, Laura Downey, Vidhya Venugopal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maarthi RajaNIHR GHRC NCD-EC, Faculty of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.
P K LathaNIHR GHRC NCD-EC, Faculty of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.
Gayathri KgNIHR GHRC NCD-EC, Faculty of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.
Akshaya Prem KumarNIHR GHRC NCD-EC, Faculty of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.
Sarada Satyamoorthy GargFaculty of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.
Maroof KhanThe George Institute for Global Health, New Delhi, India.
Guda Joseph RajuPalasa Kidney Research Centre, The George Institute for Global Health, New Delhi, India.
Chekuri GangarajuPalasa Kidney Research Centre, The George Institute for Global Health, New Delhi, India.
Laura DowneyThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Vidhya VenugopalNIHR GHRC NCD-EC, Faculty of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Community Engagement and Involvement (CEI) are increasingly recognized as vital in addressing research challenges in rural areas, especially concerning environmental health and heat exposure. The socio-culturally diverse rural communities of India face extreme heat, necessitating tailored CEI approaches for effective community involvement. This study examines CEI strategies in heat-health research in rural South India, identifying challenges encountered throughout the research process and highlighting CEI's role in overcoming them. Methods: This community-based study was conducted in 16 villages across Srikakulam and Parvathipuram Manyam districts of Andhra Pradesh in 2024, using CEI principles. A situational assessment of the state Heat Action Plan (HAP) was undertaken through desk reviews, key informant interviews, and HEAT-PROTECT based evaluations at community, workplace, and PHC levels. Primary data were collected in two phases April-July 2024 and August-December 2024 and included household and workplace surveys, assessments of heat-related knowledge and coping strategies, physiological measurements, and environmental heat monitoring. Results: Trust-building strategies, such as Community Advisory Boards (CABs) and early engagement, proved essential in accessing hard-to-reach populations. Collaborative research with community input ensured cultural sensitivity and relevance. Continuous engagement and rewarding incentives significantly improved participant retention rates, even in longitudinal studies. Community-led initiatives effectively addressed challenges like language barriers and remote data collection, enhancing data quality and long-term sustainability. Discussion: CEI strategies are instrumental in simplifying heat-health research complexities in rural Andhra Pradesh. By fostering trust and active participation, CEI strengthens research processes and outcomes. Future studies must prioritize these approaches to enhance research relevance and impact, especially for vulnerable rural populations facing extreme heat.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationData CollectionEnvironmental HealthHot TemperatureRural PopulationCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchHumansIndiacommunity engagement initiatives (CEI)data collectionfield challengesheat-related illnessrural settings

Identifiers

PMID41725775
PMCPMC12922234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.