Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41725773›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Physiological restorative benefits of different types of urban green spaces: a threshold model approach.

Danping Ma, Jianbin Lu, Qilong Wu, Jialin Zhang, Yueting Zhou, Dan Chen, Jingyi Hu, Shengyu He, Huacheng Zhao, Bo Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Danping MaSchool of Hydraulic Engineering, Zhejiang University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Hangzhou, China.
Jianbin LuWucheng District Forestry Pest Control and Quarantine Station, Jinhua, China.
Qilong WuSchool of Forestry and Biotechnology, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, China.
Jialin ZhangSchool of Forestry and Biotechnology, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, China.
Yueting ZhouSchool of Forestry and Biotechnology, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, China.
Dan ChenSchool of Forestry and Biotechnology, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, China.
Jingyi HuSchool of Forestry and Biotechnology, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, China.
Shengyu HeSchool of Forestry and Biotechnology, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, China.
Huacheng ZhaoSchool of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Zhejiang University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Hangzhou, China.
Bo YangSchool of Forestry and Biotechnology, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: As urbanization accelerates, understanding the specific health benefits of green spaces is crucial. This study investigates the physiological restorative effects of Urban Parks (UP), Remnant Forests (RF), and Wetland Parks (WP). Methods: We employed a novel physiological health effects (PHE) threshold model and EEG data to analyze participant responses to short-term exposure in these environments, establishing efficiency and benefit thresholds. Results: While all types provided benefits, they exhibited distinct patterns. UP demonstrated the most rapid and stable physiological stress reduction. Conversely, RF and WP elicited heightened physiological alertness (likely due to dense vegetation) but were subjectively perceived as having higher restorative potential due to biodiversity. Discussion: The study highlights a divergence between objective physiological recovery and subjective psychological preference. We conclude that urban planning must incorporate both ecological and sensory dimensions to maximize public health benefits across different green space types.

Indexed as

ForestsParks, RecreationalWetlandsElectroencephalographyHumansUrbanizationecosystem servicephysiological healththreshold modelurban green spacevisual naturalness

Identifiers

PMID41725773
PMCPMC12921484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.