Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41725768›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

"Now that the baby is out, I can be vaccinated": a qualitative study on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in pregnant women in Kilifi, Kenya.

Angela Koech, Onesmus Wanje, Grace Mwashigadi, Geoffrey Katana, Richmond Mdindi, Peter Mwangome, Rachel Craik, Marianne Vidler, Mai-Lei Woo Kinshella, Peter von Dadelszen and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Angela KoechCentre of Excellence for Women and Child Health - Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Onesmus WanjeCentre of Excellence for Women and Child Health - Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Grace MwashigadiCentre of Excellence for Women and Child Health - Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Geoffrey KatanaKilifi County Department of Health and Sanitation Services, Kilifi, Kenya.
Richmond MdindiKilifi County Department of Health and Sanitation Services, Kilifi, Kenya.
Peter MwangomeKilifi County Department of Health and Sanitation Services, Kilifi, Kenya.
Rachel CraikDepartment of Women and Children's Health, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Marianne VidlerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Mai-Lei Woo KinshellaDepartment of Women and Children's Health, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Peter von DadelszenDepartment of Women and Children's Health, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kirsty Le DoarePediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group and Vaccine Institute, St. George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Marleen TemmermanCentre of Excellence for Women and Child Health - Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
periCOVID-Africa Consortium
PRECISE Network

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective in pregnancy, but vaccine hesitancy limits uptake and effectiveness. This study explored COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in pregnancy in Kilifi, coastal Kenya, to elicit reasons for vaccine hesitancy and acceptance, and to compile misconceptions around vaccination in pregnancy. Twenty-three in-depth interviews were conducted with pregnant women, mothers who had given birth in the previous 2 years and health workers (community health promoters, nurses, and supervisors). Data were analyzed using thematic template analysis based on the Vaccine Hesitancy Determinants Matrix. Concern about vaccine safety for the unborn baby was a major driver of hesitancy. Many pregnant women had limited knowledge of the potential benefits to the unborn baby, leading to postponing vaccination until after pregnancy. The initial government exclusion of pregnant women from vaccination led many to believe that vaccines were unsafe in pregnancy, long after the eligibility was revised. Aggressive promotion of the vaccine by the government was a source of mistrust and misconceptions. Integrating COVID-19 vaccination into routine antenatal care improved acceptance and development and dissemination of local guidelines boosted healthcare workers' confidence in offering vaccines to pregnant women. Future rollouts of vaccines for pregnant women should consider vaccination within antenatal care clinics alongside other routine pregnancy vaccines to enhance vaccine acceptance.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnant PeopleVaccinationVaccination HesitancyAdultFemaleHumansKenyaPregnancyQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2Young AdultCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19Kenyapregnancyvaccinationvaccine acceptancevaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID41725768
PMCPMC12920558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.