SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Do brief mindfulness-based interventions improve sport-related performance? A systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Interventions in Enhancing Psychological Well-Being in Athletes: A Scoping Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are psychological skills training approaches that are well recognized for enhancing psychological factors that influence sports performance. However, some factors, such as time commitment, cost, and accessibility required for traditional MBIs, can be a barrier to regular practice. As a result, brief MBIs with a duration of ≤ 30 min have gained popularity. This systematic review aims to explore the effect of brief MBIs on short sport-related performance. Method: A comprehensive search was conducted in five databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and EBSCOhost, for articles published up to 14 November 2025. The search utilized a combination of keywords related to brief MBIs and sport-related performance. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool. Results: Ten randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Overall, brief MBIs demonstrated beneficial effects on several short sport-related performance outcomes, particularly precision-based motor skills. Significant improvements were observed in golf putting, hand grip strength, basketball tactical performance, and in some cases basketball free-throw shooting and soccer penalty kicks. However, results for basketball free-throw accuracy were mixed, and no significant effects were found for muscular endurance. The interventions varied in type, duration, and delivery mode, with most employing 4-30 min of audio-guided mindfulness practices. Risk of bias across studies was generally low, though inadequate reporting of randomization procedures was the most common concern. Conclusion: Brief MBIs lasting 30 min or less may induce short-term enhancements in certain domains of sport-related performance, particularly in tasks requiring attentional stability, fine motor control, and decision-making. However, these effects appear to be acute in nature, evidence remains inconsistent across sport types, and conclusions are limited by the small number of available studies. Future research should adopt standardized mindfulness assessments, include a broader range of physical performance indicators and relevant physiological measures to better elucidate the mechanisms underlying short-term brief MBIs effects in real competitive environments. Systematic review registration: https://inplasy.com/, INPLASY2022120086.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.