ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Dynamic trajectory of cerebral autoregulation recovery after carotid artery stenting in severe carotid stenosis.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the temporal changes and recovery patterns of dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) after carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients with severe internal carotid artery stenosis. Methods: In this prospective study, 44 patients undergoing CAS (19 symptomatic and 25 asymptomatic) and 44 age-matched healthy controls were enrolled. Patients in the CAS group underwent dCA assessments at four time points: pre-CAS (baseline, within 24 h prior to surgery), postoperative day 1 (POD 1), postoperative day 3 (POD 3), and 1 month postoperatively (POM 1). dCA was quantified using transfer function analysis (TFA), including phase difference (PD) and gain, to evaluate dCA. Results: Pre-CAS, patients had bilateral dCA impairment, worse on the affected (stenotic) side (PD: affected side: 30.56 ± 19.87° vs. unaffected side: 43.29 ± 23.29°, Conclusion: Unilateral severe carotid stenosis impairs bilateral dCA, while CAS significantly restores cerebral autoregulation. Recovery is faster on the affected side, reaching the unaffected level within 1 day, and both hemispheres reach healthy control levels by day 3. Early CAS intervention can timely improve dCA regardless of symptom status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.