ArticleFrontiers in medical technology2025
Anthropometry and diagnostic aware deep learning for exercise assessment.
Article in Frontiers in medical technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Correct technique during strength exercises such as squats and Romanian deadlifts (RDLs) is fundamental for performance and injury prevention. Objective: We introduce ADA (Anthropometry and Diagnostic Aware), a multimodal deep-learning framework that integrates IMU kinematics with anthropometric and diagnostic features to classify movement quality and predict movement related risk. Methods: Seventeen-sensor IMU data were collected from 15 healthy subjects performing correct and incorrect squat and RDL trials. A CNN-LSTM branch processed kinematic sequences and a fully connected branch processed static anthropometric/diagnostic inputs; feature fusion used attention weighting. Results: Incorporating anthropometry and diagnostic context increased sequence-level accuracy from 86.5% (kinematics only) to 94.8% (ADA) and enabled binary risk prediction at 97.8%. Personalized (transfer learning) fine tuning further improved accuracies (mean gains 3%-5% depending on window length). Conclusion: ADA demonstrates that subject-specific static features improve movement quality classification and risk stratification, supporting wearable-based personalized feedback in training and rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.