Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41725666›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026

Emotionally based strategic communications as a new tool in defensive cognitive warfare.

Krešimir Ćosić, Siniša Popović, Brenda Wiederhold

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Krešimir ĆosićUniversity of Zagreb Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Zagreb, Croatia.
Siniša PopovićUniversity of Zagreb Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Zagreb, Croatia.
Brenda WiederholdVirtual Reality Medical Center, San Diego, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In modern cognitive warfare, adversaries deliberately target human cognition, emotion, belief, trust, and decision-making processes, seeking to destabilize democratic societies through disinformation and divergent media campaigns. This article argues that the growing accessibility and vulnerability of the human emotional brain to external influence in a technologically connected world has important repercussions for global defense and security strategy. Recent EU/NATO strategic documents emphasize the need to strengthen resilience, counter hybrid/cognitive threats, and protect societies against disinformation and manipulation. Resilience to cognitive warfare, however, depends on distributed societal capacities for emotional literacy, deliberation, and comprehension-grounded in emotional and cognitive superiority, political culture, robust democratic institutions, and an informed public. Deep security crises and prolonged military conflicts arouse strong negative emotions among affected individuals, groups, and societies. Accordingly, this article proposes Emotionally Based Strategic Communications (EBSC) as a scientifically and ethically grounded approach for applying cognitive neuroscience and artificial intelligence (AI) to design emotionally resonant, legitimate, and strategically aligned communications, aiming to strengthen societal cohesion, counter adversary narratives, and build societal resilience against cognitive threats. EBSC provides tools for identifying and transforming dominant emotional states within target populations through the intentional design of structured multimodal narratives, language, imagery, and symbolic framing, with the aim of positively reconfiguring collective emotions without coercion. EBSC is conceptualized as a Large Language Model (LLM)-based systematic approach to strategic communications, which senses the emotional climate of target populations via social-sentiment analysis algorithms applied to various open digital sources; interprets and contextualizes this emotional climate; conducts design and development of appropriate output messages; delivers these messages across mass media; assesses their impact; and adapts them in a real-time closed loop, under supervision of accountable human decision-makers. The article calls for integrating the proposed closed-loop, LLM-based EBSC approach into the European defense ecosystem and strategic communications policy, aligned with EU frameworks on resilience and counter-disinformation. Such integration may offer a means of bridging cognitive neuroscience and AI into operational, scientifically informed, and emotionally resonant strategic communications that counter adversary narratives, prepare the public to resist disinformation and psychological pressure, and strengthen trust, cohesion, and overall societal resilience among EU/NATO allies.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecognitive neurosciencecognitive warfareemotionally based strategic communicationsEuropean defense and securitylarge language model

Identifiers

PMID41725666
PMCPMC12920201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.