Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41725660›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Further evidence for the cognitive disruption and self-talk frequency hypothesis.

Thomas M Brinthaupt, Michael J Connelly, Francesca Mallia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas M BrinthauptDepartment of Psychology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN, United States.
Michael J ConnellyDepartment of Psychology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN, United States.
Francesca MalliaDepartment of Psychology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Past research has shown support for a positive relationship between cognitive disruption and self-talk frequency in response to specific situations. In this paper, we report three studies that examine further the cognitive disruption and self-talk frequency hypothesis among college students. We sought to identify facets of decreased or increased cognitive disruption that should be associated with either less or more frequent self-talk. Methods: In Study 1, participants ( Results: Study 1 results showed that, as expected, individuals with a weaker sense of self and lower levels of mindful awareness reported higher frequencies of self-talk. Study 2 results showed that frequent self-talkers reported significantly more dissociative experiences and higher levels of self-control than infrequent self-talkers. Study 3 results showed that higher antisocial personality and psychopathy scores were significantly related to more frequent negative and self-critical self-talk. Conclusion: These studies provide strong support for the hypothesis that instances of cognitive disruption are associated with an increased likelihood of self-talk in response to specific situations. We also showed that factors that should be associated with reduced cognitive disruption were associated with less frequent self-talk. We discuss the implications of these findings for future research in personality psychology.

Indexed as

antisocial personalitycognitive disruptiondissociative experiencesmindful awarenesspsychopathologyself-controlself-talkweak sense of self

Identifiers

PMID41725660
PMCPMC12916616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.