ArticleJournal of the science of food and agriculture2026
Fermentation techniques for protein enrichment of cassava peel.
Article in Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Feeding strategies with fresh cassava root to improve dairy cow productivity in the tropics.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe use of agro-industrial by-products such as unconventional feeds in animal production is an alternative for reducing the high costs associated with conventional feeds. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of aeration, pH adjustment, the use of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and the amount of urea on the enrichment of cassava peel (CPe) by mixed fermentation and their impacts on chemical composition, protein fractionation, nutrient cost and yield. Two experiments were conducted. Experiment 1 evaluated the effects of aeration (A) and pH adjustment (pHad). Experiment 2 assessed the effects of yeast inoculation (Y) and urea dose (U). Yeast treatments consisted of either inoculation at 50 g kg
resultsIn Experiment 1, an interaction (P < 0.05) was observed on the concentration of ash, ether extract, protein fraction A, fresh matter yield and dry matter cost. Aeration of the solutions applied to CPe increased crude protein (CP) concentration. In Experiment 2, no interaction was observed for CP. Separately, the U120 dose increased CP content because of higher nitrogen availability, whereas yeast inoculation also significantly increased CP, suggesting the conversion of non-protein nitrogen into microbial true protein (yeast biomass).
conclusionMixed fermentation is effective in increasing the protein concentration of CPe. Aeration has a greater impact on the protein content than pH adjustment. Furthermore, the urea dose has a greater impact on protein content than the yeast inoculation in the enrichment process of non-aerated CPe. © 2026 The Author(s). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.