Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41725618›Full record

ArticleNursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals2026

The Healing Hermeneutics of Carnal Caring in Neonatal Intensive Care Units.

Cas Wepener, Clara Wepener, Berna Gerber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cas WepenerStellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7468-1481
Clara WepenerStellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0368-4182
Berna GerberStellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2195-6661

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of the incorporation of the body and the senses, especially touch, in caring for infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) has been widely researched, resulting in practices such as skin-to skin care. This article takes a step back to scrutinise the underlying assumptions of these practices and links the notions of a bodily epistemology and relational ontology to the care of infants in the NICU by means of recent developments in the fields of philosophy and ritual studies. The temporal-spatial context of people involved in caring for hospitalised infants is explored through the lens of the concept of liminality, a concept that stems from the study of rites of passage and thus of people in a state of transition. The relatively new field of carnal hermeneutics is then engaged, first in a general sense with a special emphasis on bodies, flesh and skin as sources of knowledge, and secondly with an emphasis on bodies that are restricted in space, such as infants and their caregivers in NICUs. It is argued that a deeper understanding of the unique kind of liminality that is encountered by people such as mothers and infants in NICUs and of carnal caring emphasises the healing potential inherent in a family-centred care approach and highlights the need for implementation in NICUs. A better understanding of the 'why' of carnal caring is essential for optimising the 'how' of the praxis.

Indexed as

HermeneuticsIntensive Care Units, NeonatalHumansInfant, Newborncarnal hermeneuticsepistemologyfamily centred carehermeneuticsliminalityneonatal intensive careontology

Identifiers

PMID41725618
PMCPMC12931363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.