Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41725593›Full record

ArticleNursing inquiry2026

From Resilience to Resistance: Rethinking Faculty Well-Being as a Moral and Political Problem in Nursing Education-Toward a Humane Ethics of Academic Care.

Suha Ballout, Samira Hamadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing inquiry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Suha BalloutDepartment of Biobehavioral Nursing & Health Informatics, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4193-1218
Samira HamadehInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University Australia, Berwick, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9113-5861

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper explores faculty well-being in nursing education as a moral and political issue, emphasizing a humane ethics of academic care that confronts institutional harm, moral distress, and inequality. Despite nursing's commitments to compassion, equity, and justice, many educators face excessive workloads, racial exclusion, and moral conflicts, leading to burnout and moral injury. Current wellness approaches individualize distress and hide institutional responsibility. Drawing on critical, decolonial, and ethical traditions, the paper challenges resilience-based discourses, framing faculty well-being as a collective moral obligation rooted in governance and power. It synthesizes decolonial scholarship, moral resilience, transformational leadership, and human rights, grounded in ethical principles and ESG standards. Using examples from faculty development and institutional practice, it introduces the Becoming HUMANE Framework as a lens, not a model, to understand healing, rights, resilience, accountability, belonging, and empowerment as essential to ethical academic environments. Nurse educators are positioned as tempered radicals whose reflective resistance turns moral distress into collective agency and accountability. Reframing well-being as a moral and political issue reveals the limits of individual resilience and advocates for humane academic systems. Nursing education must address institutional conditions affecting educator well-being to uphold its moral commitments.

Indexed as

Education, NursingFaculty, NursingMoralsPoliticsResilience, PsychologicalAcademiaEthics, NursingHumansacademic caredecolonial practicefaculty well‐beinginstitutional ethicsmoral injurymoral resiliencenursing educationtempered radicalism

Identifiers

PMID41725593
PMCPMC12926933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.