ReviewDermatology online journal2025
31-Gene expression profiling for cutaneous melanoma: an expert consensus panel.
Review in Dermatology online journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose To review published literature on the clinical efficacy, use, and accuracy of the 31-gene expression profiling (31-GEP) test for prognostic information in invasive melanoma. Methods A comprehensive literature search used keywords "31-gene expression profiling," "melanoma," "prognosis," "clinical efficacy," and "clinical utility." A panel of 10 dermatologists with expertise in melanoma management reviewed the articles and created consensus statements. A modified Delphi process approved each statement, requiring supermajority approval through multiple rounds of real-time voting, with strength of recommendation assigned. Results The search produced 150 articles; 26 met inclusion criteria. The panel unanimously voted to adopt 9 consensus statements and recommendations regarding 31-GEP testing: 8 with strength "A" and 1 with strength "C." Conclusion The panel agreed there is strong support for using 31-GEP testing to provide prognostic information for invasive melanoma. The test provides prognostic information when thickness and other traditional factors are unknown, improves prognosis assessment when added to American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition staging system, and is associated with improved melanoma-specific mortality and overall survival. The panel concluded that the robust existing literature strongly supports its use as a best practice for appropriate patients with melanoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41725468What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.