Trial reportAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2026
Clinical Trial: Early Nivolumab Addition to Regorafenib in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Second-Line (The GOING Trial).
Trial report in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immunotherapy Rechallenge in HCC: A Second Chance for Response?Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsHighly effective second-line treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma remain an unmet need. The GOING investigator-initiated Phase I/IIa trial evaluated regorafenib plus nivolumab (add-on) in patients who progressed on sorafenib (Cohort-A) or discontinued atezolizumab-bevacizumab (Cohort-B).
methodsPatients received regorafenib for two 28-day cycles, adding nivolumab in cycle 3, until unacceptable adverse events, symptomatic progression, withdrawal or death. Primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, time to progression, post-progression survival, objective response rate and incidence of new-extrahepatic-spread.
resultsOf 85 patients screened, 67 were enrolled (75.5% BCLC-C). All experienced adverse events and 9% led to discontinuation. Severe treatment-related adverse events occurred in 28.4% overall, 32.1% in Cohort-A, and 14.3% in Cohort-B. Median overall survival was 20.0 (95% CI 11-37) months, with 40.6% survival at 36 months. In Cohort-A, median overall survival was 25 (95% CI 14-39) months with 45% survival at 36 months, while Cohort-B median overall survival was 8 (95% CI 4-NE) months with 28.6% survival at 24 months. Objective response rate was 16.4%; median time to progression and post-progression survival were 5 (95% CI 4-9) months and 14 (95% CI 8-33) months. Intrahepatic growth was the most common progression pattern, followed by new-extrahepatic-spread.
conclusionsThe add-on strategy of regorafenib plus nivolumab in second-line had manageable safety and significant clinical activity with a noteworthy median overall survival of 20 months. Among those progressing on sorafenib, 45% were alive at 3 years. These findings support further evaluation with mechanism-guided trials after progression on immunotherapy.
trial registrationEudraCT number: 2019-003108-10; https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.