Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41725312›Full record

ArticleBJPsych bulletin2026

Modernising the Mental State Examination: embedding eating and nutritional assessment into the 21st-century MSE.

Edwin Birch, James Downs, Agnes Ayton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych bulletin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edwin BirchPsychiatry, https://ror.org/04c8bjx39Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6020-4310
James DownsIndependent scholar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4321-8574
Agnes AytonCotswold House, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3722-0854

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

methodThe Mental State Examination (MSE) is a core component of psychiatric assessment and medical training, yet it was developed before feeding or eating disorders (FEDs) were widely recognised. FEDs are now common, clinically severe and frequently missed in routine assessments. We conducted a narrative review of the historical development of the MSE, current UK medical education standards and relevant literature, supplemented by a lived-experience perspective, to examine whether the MSE adequately captures eating behaviour, nutritional status and body image disturbance.

resultsWe identified no published studies examining the explicit inclusion of FED-related psychopathology within the MSE. Current frameworks lack systematic prompts for eating behaviours and nutrition, contributing to under-recognition. Contributing factors include historical MSE design, limited curriculum coverage, clinician uncertainty and patient non-disclosure. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Embedding brief, semi-structured prompts into the MSE is a feasible training-aligned approach to improve detection, support curriculum modernisation and enhance patient safety.

Indexed as

feeding or eating disorders (FEDs)medical educationMental State Examination (MSE)nutritional psychiatrypsychiatric assessment

Identifiers

PMID41725312
PMCPMC13386287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.