ArticleStatistics in medicine2026
Modelling and Predicting Population-Level Growth With Individual-Level Information.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) in children has been the subject of considerable interest due to secular changes in growth patterns, such as increases in height and rising obesity rates. Predicting growth in a target population is particularly challenging when the population comprises of individuals with and without past growth data. In this study, we present three approaches for the joint prediction of height and weight in that situation. The predictive performance of each approach is evaluated using a range of measures that assess different properties of the prediction distributions. We also compare the approaches to interpret their clinical relevance, particularly in terms of prediction accuracy. The developed prediction approaches vary in their use of past growth data. We predict growth for a target population of children aged 4-11 years in 2021, residing in three municipalities in Finland. We employ longitudinal register data on height and weight, collected from children aged 2-11 years between 2014 and 2020 in these municipalities to construct a Bayesian hierarchical linear model (HLM) for growth prediction. Additionally, we estimate posterior unconditional distributions of height, weight, and BMI for within-sample model validation. The inclusion of individual-level data in the predictions reduced the divergence from observed measurements, particularly for weight and BMI. This is important given the skewed distribution of the measurements with increasing age. Incorporating individual-level information is also beneficial for child-specific predictions. Our study highlights the importance of multiple prediction checks to understand the flaws and strengths of each prediction approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.