Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41725310›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2026

Modelling and Predicting Population-Level Growth With Individual-Level Information.

Tuuli Kauppala, Tuomo Susi, Sangita Kulathinal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tuuli KauppalaDepartment of Data and Analytics, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1233-0055
Tuomo SusiDepartment of Data and Analytics, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Sangita KulathinalDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4542-8460

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) in children has been the subject of considerable interest due to secular changes in growth patterns, such as increases in height and rising obesity rates. Predicting growth in a target population is particularly challenging when the population comprises of individuals with and without past growth data. In this study, we present three approaches for the joint prediction of height and weight in that situation. The predictive performance of each approach is evaluated using a range of measures that assess different properties of the prediction distributions. We also compare the approaches to interpret their clinical relevance, particularly in terms of prediction accuracy. The developed prediction approaches vary in their use of past growth data. We predict growth for a target population of children aged 4-11 years in 2021, residing in three municipalities in Finland. We employ longitudinal register data on height and weight, collected from children aged 2-11 years between 2014 and 2020 in these municipalities to construct a Bayesian hierarchical linear model (HLM) for growth prediction. Additionally, we estimate posterior unconditional distributions of height, weight, and BMI for within-sample model validation. The inclusion of individual-level data in the predictions reduced the divergence from observed measurements, particularly for weight and BMI. This is important given the skewed distribution of the measurements with increasing age. Incorporating individual-level information is also beneficial for child-specific predictions. Our study highlights the importance of multiple prediction checks to understand the flaws and strengths of each prediction approach.

Indexed as

Body HeightBody WeightModels, StatisticalPopulation GrowthBayes TheoremBody Mass IndexChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFinlandHumansLinear ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMalePrediction AlgorithmsBayesian predictionbivariate hierarchical modelgrowth modelinggrowth predictionhierarchical linear model

Identifiers

PMID41725310
PMCPMC12926727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.