ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2026
Classifying avian drinking behaviour: ecological insights and implications in a changing world.
Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanistic insights into avian and chiropteran thermal risk exposure in a warming world.Conservation physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Water is a fundamental currency of life, and its availability significantly influences animal behaviour, physiology and distributions. However, our knowledge around the dependence on water for drinking and the direct and indirect mechanisms driving related behaviours remains partial in the context of changing climates. Here, we review patterns and classifications of avian reliance on water consumption and the role of abiotic and biotic factors in drinking habits. We bring to light the void of information regarding drinking habits in relation to thermal physiology, and then review existing literature related to the behaviour of drinking. We attempt to highlight misconceptions related to the typical classification of drinkers versus non-drinkers and direct future research efforts to improve our understanding of the dynamic relationship between water availability, acquisition, and maintenance under climate change. We conclude that despite the common dichotomous use of drinking versus non-drinking classifications in climate vulnerability assessments, this trait is highly flexible and occurs along a continuum from specialist non-drinking species to highly dependent drinking species driven by abiotic and biotic pressures. While some recent assessments continue to apply binary traits, our gradient-based approach advances ecological relevance by accounting for context-dependent flexibility. Consequently, previous approaches assessing drinking versus non-drinking species may not be as ecologically relevant as previously thought. Improving our understanding of the spatial and temporal trends in how species acquire or use water for drinking, along with sound empirical data, will continue to shape our theoretical understanding of this trait. We emphasise that understanding drinking as a trait is critically important for comprehending species vulnerabilities to anticipated future climates, especially given predicted changes and increased variability in water availability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.