Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41725197›Full record

ArticleNursing open2026

Work Schedule Preferences and Shift Schedules of Per-Diem Nurses: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study of Online Labour Platform Data-Empirical Research Quantitative.

Marcel Dettling, Florian Liberatore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marcel DettlingZHAW School of Engineering, Institute of Data Analysis and Process Design, Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4340-6142
Florian LiberatoreZHAW School of Management and Law, Winterthur Institute of Health Economics, Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7147-6485

Funding

National Science FoundationSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 187433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe paper analyses the work schedule preferences and actual shift work schedules of per-diem nurses using data from an online labour platform that allows institutions to book per-diem nurses for single shifts.

designDescriptive cross-sectional study of data from a Swiss online labour platform. DATA SOURCES: Comprehensive data from a Swiss online labour platform about shift availabilities and resulting shift work for the booking period of 2022 (full sample). On the platform, healthcare providers can book per-diem nurses for single shifts based on the nurses' individual shift availability offers.

resultsThe distribution of the 2022 shift availability count per nurse has a median of 15, resulting in 12 shifts worked, with higher success rates for nurses offering more availabilities. This corresponds to a global conversion rate of 87.95%. On average, per-diem nurses are booked by three different institutions. The median time between entry of a shift availability and booking by an institution is 7.3 days, whereas the time between the booking date and the shift is on average 24.1 days.

conclusionPer-diem nurses on online labour platforms are booked in advance rather than on a short-term basis. The low number of shifts offered and worked as a per-diem nurse reveals that per-diem nurse work is more of a side job than a substitute for a permanent position. The low number of annual shifts per institution highlights the potential issue in per-diem nurse work of a lack of familiarity with institutional processes and structures. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: The average lead time of 24.1 days on the platform indicates that shift managers should consider the use of per-diem nurses according to expected shift demands during shift planning instead of using them on a short-term basis. The low number of shifts worked as a per-diem nurse per institution confirms the challenges that temporary nurses face as a result of their low institution-specific work experience. IMPACT: What problem did the study address? The quality of the working experience as a per-diem nurse, as well as the effectiveness of the deployment of these nurses in institutions, depends to a great extent on the patterns of work schedule preferences and the actual implementation in real work schedules in the institutions. Data from online labour platforms allow a comprehensive analysis of these patterns revealed by shift availabilities of temporary nurses and resulting patterns of actual shift work schedules based on booking information. What were the main findings? (1) Institutions book per-diem nurses more on a monthly than on a short-term basis. (2) The low number of shift availabilities annually and resulting annual shift volume reveal that per-diem nurse work is more of a side job than a substitute for a permanent position. (3) Per-diem nurses offer and are booked for a variety of shift types and not only for certain 'preferable/unpreferable' shifts. (4) On average, per-diem nurses work in an individual institution for only a low single-digit number of shifts. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? Nursing managers will learn about relevant statistics and their relevance in using online labour platforms for their shift planning. Nursing researchers will learn about the potential online labour platform data offer for analysing the characteristics, volume and patterns of per-diem nurse work. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Per-diem nurses were involved solely in the data provision process, by giving their consent to the analysis of the platform data. No participant contributions were required for the study's design, data analysis or interpretation. REPORTING

methodI state that I have adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines (STROBE checklist).

Indexed as

Personnel Staffing and SchedulingShift Work ScheduleWork Schedule ToleranceCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSwitzerlandonline labour platformsper‐diem nursesper‐diem nurse workshift workwork preferences

Identifiers

PMID41725197
PMCPMC12928123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.