Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41725060›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2026

(Self-)caring with companion animals: a qualitative exploration of how companion animals shape everyday practices of rest and relaxation.

Renelle McGlacken, Vanessa Ashall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Renelle McGlackenWaltham Petcare Science Institute, Mars Petcare Inc., Melton Mowbray, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0884-3347
Vanessa AshallWaltham Petcare Science Institute, Mars Petcare Inc., Melton Mowbray, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5263-2339

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis paper aims to extend and enrich the concept of self-care, through demonstrating how self-care can manifest as both a relational and multispecies endeavour.

methodWe qualitatively examined how people understand their relationships with companion animal(s) as shaping their practices of rest and relaxation. This paper is based on a reflexive thematic analysis of 31in-depth interviews with cat and dog owners across several countries.

resultsOur analysis illustrates how practices of caring for companion animals and the obligations that drive them can also work to promote self-care. We draw out the ways in which obligations to care for companion animals can provide a sense of permission for and prioritisation of moments and activities that are experienced as mutually 'care-full'. The paper reveals the role of companion animals in daily navigation and negotiation of temporal and normative barriers around rest and relaxation.

conclusionsThis paper emphasises the important role that non-human animals can play in everyday practices and experiences of rest and relaxation.

Indexed as

Human-Animal BondPetsRelaxationRestSelf CareAdultAnimalsCatsDogsFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchCompanion animalsmultispeciesobligationrest and relaxationself-carewellbeing

Identifiers

PMID41725060
PMCPMC12931344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.