Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41725039›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2026

Bias in Structural MRI Correlates of Delay Discounting due to Head Motion.

James Read-Tannock, Andrew Reid, Etienne Farcot, Martin Schürmann, Christopher R Madan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

James Read-TannockSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9282-4733
Andrew ReidSchool of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0523-926X
Etienne FarcotSchool of Mathematical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0742-3028
Martin SchürmannSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0848-0251
Christopher R MadanSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3228-6501

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T0083690/1NIH HHS 1U54MH091657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing number of studies report that delay discounting, a measure used to evaluate impulsive behaviour, is associated with the regional volume or thickness of cortical grey matter. Using 1096 participants' MRI data from the open Human Connectome Project Young Adults dataset, we show that delay discounting correlates significantly with in-scanner head motion, a prevalent cause of artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging. Furthermore, head motion was found to bias estimates of grey matter thickness downwards across much of the neocortex, including many of the regions where delay discounting has been associated with reduced grey matter, suggesting these effects may be confounded by motion artifacts. The effects associated with delay discounting were also significantly correlated with the cortical thinning effects associated with motion under a spin permutation null model. In conclusion, we suggest that any future studies investigating structural correlates of delay discounting should correct for motion effects-either during data acquisition or by including a movement covariate when fitting models.

Indexed as

ArtifactsBrainDelay DiscountingGray MatterHead MovementsMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultConnectomeFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41725039
PMCPMC12928027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.