ArticleHuman brain mapping2026
Bias in Structural MRI Correlates of Delay Discounting due to Head Motion.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A growing number of studies report that delay discounting, a measure used to evaluate impulsive behaviour, is associated with the regional volume or thickness of cortical grey matter. Using 1096 participants' MRI data from the open Human Connectome Project Young Adults dataset, we show that delay discounting correlates significantly with in-scanner head motion, a prevalent cause of artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging. Furthermore, head motion was found to bias estimates of grey matter thickness downwards across much of the neocortex, including many of the regions where delay discounting has been associated with reduced grey matter, suggesting these effects may be confounded by motion artifacts. The effects associated with delay discounting were also significantly correlated with the cortical thinning effects associated with motion under a spin permutation null model. In conclusion, we suggest that any future studies investigating structural correlates of delay discounting should correct for motion effects-either during data acquisition or by including a movement covariate when fitting models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.