Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41724978›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2026

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships and development of resistance of enrofloxacin and cefquinome in combination therapy against Klebsiella pneumoniae in chicks.

Yanzhe Wei, Fuhui Zhang, Xilong Liu, Xinyu Li, Tongfei Li, Yafei Li, Huanzhong Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yanzhe WeiShiyan Key Laboratory of Natural Medicine Nano Formulation Research, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Hubei University of Medicine, Renmin Road No. 30, Shiyan, 442000, Hubei, China.
Fuhui ZhangGuangdong Key Laboratory for Veterinary Drug Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Xilong LiuGuangdong Key Laboratory for Veterinary Drug Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Xinyu LiShiyan Key Laboratory of Natural Medicine Nano Formulation Research, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Hubei University of Medicine, Renmin Road No. 30, Shiyan, 442000, Hubei, China.
Tongfei LiShiyan Key Laboratory of Natural Medicine Nano Formulation Research, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Hubei University of Medicine, Renmin Road No. 30, Shiyan, 442000, Hubei, China. litongfeihappy@163.com.
Yafei LiInstitute of Quality Standard and Monitoring Technology for Agro-products of Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China. liyafei@gdaas.cn.
Huanzhong DingGuangdong Key Laboratory for Veterinary Drug Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China. hzding@scau.edu.cn.

Funding

Faculty Development Grants from Hubei University of Medicine 2024QDJZR020Hubei University of Medicine 2025 College Students' Innovation Training Program Project X202510929061National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFD1800904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe antibiotic resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae poses significant challenges in veterinary clinical settings and threatens poultry production. Veterinarians often employ combination therapy to address this issue. However, the resulting effects are complex and not well understood. This study aims to describe the therapeutic effects of different dosing regimens of enrofloxacin (ENR) and cefquinome (CEQ) in a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model using chicks.

methodsThis experiment utilized a chick pneumonia model, and the dosing regimen of the combination drug was divided into three single-dose groups and three split-dose groups for three consecutive days; The PK/PD fitting analysis was conducted using the Inhibitory Sigmoid Emax model; The alterations in bacterial load of drug-resistant K. pneumoniae CLS2 (Clinical strain) were assessed through viable bacterial counts and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC); Additionally, the resistance mutations and efflux pump activity of the resistant strains were evaluated.

resultsThe MICs of ENR and CEQ for CLS2 were 2 µg/mL and 0.125 µg/mL, respectively. The PD results demonstrated that the efficacy of the split-dose group, which received 20 mg/kg of ENR in combination with 20 mg/kg of CEQ (ΔE = 5.66 Log10 CFU/mL), significantly surpassed that of the single-dose group (ΔE = 2.80 Log10 CFU/mL). The combination therapy group, where CEQ was administered at split doses of 4 and 20 mg/kg demonstrated bactericidal activity (ΔE ≥ 3.05 Log10 CFU/mL) and exhibited a substantial clearance effect against K. pneumoniae, respectively. The PK/PD parameters indicated that the parameter value required to achieve a 3 Log10 CFU/mL reduction for %T > MIC(combined) (R2 > 0.900) was calculated at 37.062.

conclusionsENR administered via intramuscular injection at 10 mg/kg and CEQ at 2.6 mg/kg both twice daily for three consecutive days was effective for addressing pulmonary infections in chicks induced by K. pneumoniae and may also help postpone the development of antibiotic resistance. Furthermore, a thoughtfully formulated combination therapy approach could potentially mitigate the rise of resistant strains.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsEnrofloxacinKlebsiella InfectionsKlebsiella pneumoniaePoultry DiseasesAnimalsChickensDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Resistance, BacterialDrug Therapy, CombinationMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSecond Generation CephalosporinsThird Generation CephalosporinsAnti-Bacterial AgentscefquinomeCephalosporinsEnrofloxacinSecond Generation CephalosporinsThird Generation CephalosporinsCefquinomeChickCombination therapyEnrofloxacinKlebsiella pneumoniaePK/PD model

Identifiers

PMID41724978
PMCPMC13134116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.