Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41724962›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Impact of male partner's age on IVF/ICSI pregnancy outcomes stratified by female age: a retrospective study of 1,703 treatment cycles.

Yulan Zhou, Yunqing Li, Haiyan Yue, Lanlan Yin, Tianzhong Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yulan ZhouReproductive Medicine Center, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524001, China.
Yunqing LiReproductive Medicine Center, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524001, China.
Haiyan YueReproductive Medicine Center, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524001, China.
Lanlan YinReproductive Medicine Center, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524001, China.
Tianzhong MaReproductive Medicine Center, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524001, China. mtz@gdmu.edu.cn.

Funding

grants from the Wu Jieping Medical Foundation Special Fund for Clinical Research 320.6750.2025-6-111Zhanjiang Science and Technology Plan Project 2022A01169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing male age has been linked to reduced sperm quality and poorer pregnancy outcomes in assisted reproductive technolo (ART) cycles; however, the combined effects of both paternal and maternal ages remain controversial.

methodsA retrospective analysis of 1703 fresh embryo transfer cycles (January 2018–June 2024) was conducted. Females were stratified into < 35 years (n = 1,188) and ≥ 35 years (n = 515). Within each female age group, male partners were further subdivided into narrower age categories. Sperm parameters (concentration, progressive motility [PR%], normal morphology, DNA fragmentation index [DFI]) and pregnancy outcomes (clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, live birth rate) were compared using Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test. Propensity score matching (PSM) adjusted for confounding factors.

resultsAmong females age < 35 group, no significant associations were observed between male age and clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, or live birth rate (all P > 0.05). Although age 35 in males appeared to be a potential inflection point for changes in reproductive outcomes, comparative analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in pregnancy outcomes between men < 35 years and those ≥ 35 years. In female aged ≥ 35 years, increasing male age was significantly correlated with a lower live birth rate (P = 0.032). Compared to the < 40 years group, male age ≥ 40 years exhibited significantly higher miscarriage rates (32.5% vs. 21.8%, P = 0.039) and lower live birth rates (31.2% vs. 39.2%, P = 0.035). These trends persisted after PSM adjustment for confounders, with the age ≥ 40 years group demonstrating a 15.2% increase in miscarriage rate (37.2% vs. 22.0%, P = 0.026) and a 10.7% reduction in live birth rate (32.0% vs. 42.7%, P = 0.037). Notably, there were no significant differences in fertilization rate, good-quality embryo rate, or blastocyst formation rate across male age subgroups (all P > 0.05). Further analysis revealed that advanced male age was associated with significantly higher DFI abnormality rates. The high-DFI group showed increased biochemical pregnancy loss (11.7% vs. 5.2%) and miscarriage rates (38.0% vs. 20.9%), with significantly elevated DFI levels in the miscarriage group versus non-miscarriage group (P = 0.030). However, DFI showed no significant correlation with embryo quality parameters or clinical pregnancy rate.

conclusionThis retrospective analysis demonstrates that the impact of male age on IVF/ICSI outcomes is dependent on the female partner’s age. Specifically, male age is not significantly correlated with clinical outcomes when the female partner is under 35 years; however, among female age ≥ 35 years, advanced male age is associated with increased miscarriage rates and decreased live birth rates. Sperm DNA damage may contribute to these adverse outcomes observed in older female partners. Therefore, careful evaluation and management of sperm DNA integrity should be prioritized in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Fertilization in VitroPaternal AgePregnancy OutcomeSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicAbortion, SpontaneousAdultAdvanced Maternal AgeAge FactorsEmbryo TransferFemaleHumansLive BirthMaleMaternal AgePregnancyPregnancy RateAge interactionAssisted Reproductive Technology (ART)Female ageMale agePregnancy outcomes

Identifiers

PMID41724962
PMCPMC13032545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.