SynthesisSports medicine - open2026
Upper Extremity Return to Sport Functional Testing: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Sports medicine - open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Rigid-Body Pendulum Model for Plyometric Push-Up Biomechanics: Analytical Derivation and Numerical Quantification of Flight Time, Arc Displacement, Maximum Height, and Mechanical Power Output.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUpper extremity return to sport (RTS) assessments are not standardized with respect to which metrics to use, if the metrics are appropriate for all populations and levels of competition, and what constitutes good or poor test performance. Subsequently, clinicians may utilize suboptimal metrics to evaluate RTS readiness, or forgo objective criteria altogether. The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties (reliability, agreement/measurement error, hypothesis testing/construct validity, criterion/predictive validity, responsiveness) of upper extremity functional tests used to assess RTS readiness.
methodsThis systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines, with all studies included assessed via the PEDro scale. Literature searches covering PubMed, Google Scholar and Medline databases were completed through November 2024. Studies focusing on the reliability and/or validity of upper extremity functional tests in athletes were included.
resultsA total of 5166 studies were identified; 60 studies met criteria for data extraction. Among the identified tests, the Single Arm Shot Put test (SASP), Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (CKCUEST), and the Upper Quarter Y-Balance test (UQY) were the most frequently investigated. The SASP emerged as consistently reliable (the preponderance reporting ICC > 0.90), with construct validity evidenced by correlations with upper extremity isokinetic torque and performance on other functional tests. The CKCUEST demonstrated good to excellent reliability across age, sex, and sport, including individuals with shoulder pain (ICC = 0.73-0.98). Construct validity was established via strong correlations with grip and isokinetic upper extremity strength (P < 0.01), and concurrent validity when compared to other upper extremity functional tests. The CKCUEST also demonstrates predictive validity for determining future upper extremity injury risk, and discriminant validity distinguishing individuals with and without current shoulder injury. The UQY yielded mixed reliability, with ICC = 0.47-0.97; additionally, numerous studies found no significant relationships between the UQY and other measures (strength and/or other upper extremity functional tests). The athletic shoulder test (ASH) is an emerging test designed to evaluate isometric strength of the upper body in 3 positions with the athlete prone. Across all testing positions, the ASH has excellent test-retest reliability (ICCs ranging from 0.94 to 0.98), and has demonstrated high concurrent validity when a sphygmomanometer or hand-held dynamometer is utilized instead of a force plate.
conclusionsThis is the first extensive systematic review examining the psychometric properties of commonly administered upper extremity functional tests used to determine RTS criteria, with 60 articles analyzed. The CKCUEST and SASP demonstrate consistent reliability and validity across multiple athletic populations. Understanding strengths and limitations of upper extremity functional tests aids clinicians in choosing appropriate assessments for RTS across age, sex, sport, and level, as well as healthy and injured athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.