ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Robotic surgery in France: insights from a national administrative database on utilization, access, and efficiency.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic-assisted surgery has become an integral component of minimally invasive surgery, yet its nationwide diffusion and real-world impact in France have only recently become measurable following the implementation of mandatory procedural traceability. We conducted a nationwide, retrospective, cross-sectional study. All adult patients undergoing selected urologic, digestive, gynecologic, and thoracic procedures between January 2021 and December 2022 were included. Surgical approaches were classified as robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, or open. Primary outcomes were national volumes, robotic penetration rates, and regional distribution. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, intensive care unit admission, and 30- and 90-day readmission rates. A total of 58 232 robotic-assisted procedures were identified, increasing from 27 011 in 2021 to 31,221 in 2022 (+ 15.6%), and accounting for 15.6% of minimally invasive procedures. Urology predominated (61%), followed by digestive (17%), gynecologic (15%), and thoracic surgery (7%). Robotic penetration reached 54.9% in urology but remained below 15% in other specialties. Marked regional disparities were observed, with Île-de-France accounting for over 27% of all robotic procedures, while several regions reported minimal or no activity. Compared with laparoscopic and open surgery, robotic-assisted procedures were associated with shorter length of stay (4.2 vs. 5.7 and 7.9 days, respectively), lower intensive care unit admission rates (6.3% vs. 9.7% and 14.1%), and reduced 30-day readmissions (4.8% vs. 5.6% and 6.9%). Robotic-assisted surgery in France is expanding and associated with improved early postoperative outcomes, but its adoption remains highly uneven, highlighting the need for coordinated national planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.