Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41724865›Full record

SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2026

Robotic surgery (R-TAMIS): a systematic review.

Joachim Cheng En Ho, Clement Jing Cheng Yong, Aryan Raj Goel, Ayan Bin Rafaih, Irshad Shaikh, Muhammad Rafaih Iqbal

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joachim Cheng En HoCollege of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. J.C.E.Ho@sms.ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3301-2373
Clement Jing Cheng YongUCL medical school, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1457-3683
Aryan Raj GoelSt Richard's Hospital, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Chichester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3670-984X
Ayan Bin RafaihAitchison College, Education Department, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-8393-6756
Irshad ShaikhNorfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1467-815X
Muhammad Rafaih IqbalMid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5737-9558

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (R-TAMIS) is increasingly used for local excision of rectal lesions, offering improved precision, ergonomics and access compared with conventional TAMIS. Although early reviews demonstrated feasibility, pooled data on operative and oncological outcomes remain limited. This systematic review synthesizes contemporary evidence to provide descriptive weighted estimates of procedural efficiency, safety and short-term clinical outcomes. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science through June 2025 identified studies reporting R-TAMIS outcomes in ≥ 5 patients. Extracted variables included demographics, operative metrics and oncological results. Continuous data were descriptively pooled when possible, and risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute and Newcastle-Ottawa tools. Owing to heterogeneity, findings were summarized qualitatively. Twenty-two studies (n = 437), predominantly case series, met inclusion criteria. The mean patient age was 63 years, BMI 27.5 kg/m2 and ASA score 2.2. Robotic systems used included da Vinci S/Si/Xi/SP and Medrobotics Flex platforms. Mean docking time was 20 min, operative duration 103 min, blood loss 18 mL and hospital stay 1.7 days. Postoperative morbidity remained low (Clavien-Dindo I–II 8%, III 1%) with reoperation and readmission rates of 2%. R0 resection was achieved in 96% of tumors, most of which are early stage (77%). R-TAMIS appears safe and feasible for local excision of early rectal tumors, with descriptive estimates suggesting low perioperative morbidity and short hospital stay. While currently more costly than laparoscopic TAMIS, efficiency gains in high-volume centers may mitigate costs. Further prospective studies are needed to better define outcomes and refine procedural indications.

Indexed as

Minimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRectal NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresTransanal Endoscopic SurgeryHumansLength of StayMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeLocal excisionRectal neoplasmsRobotic surgerySystematic reviewTransanal minimally invasive surgery

Identifiers

PMID41724865
PMCPMC12926246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.