SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2026
Robotic surgery (R-TAMIS): a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (R-TAMIS) is increasingly used for local excision of rectal lesions, offering improved precision, ergonomics and access compared with conventional TAMIS. Although early reviews demonstrated feasibility, pooled data on operative and oncological outcomes remain limited. This systematic review synthesizes contemporary evidence to provide descriptive weighted estimates of procedural efficiency, safety and short-term clinical outcomes. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science through June 2025 identified studies reporting R-TAMIS outcomes in ≥ 5 patients. Extracted variables included demographics, operative metrics and oncological results. Continuous data were descriptively pooled when possible, and risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute and Newcastle-Ottawa tools. Owing to heterogeneity, findings were summarized qualitatively. Twenty-two studies (n = 437), predominantly case series, met inclusion criteria. The mean patient age was 63 years, BMI 27.5 kg/m2 and ASA score 2.2. Robotic systems used included da Vinci S/Si/Xi/SP and Medrobotics Flex platforms. Mean docking time was 20 min, operative duration 103 min, blood loss 18 mL and hospital stay 1.7 days. Postoperative morbidity remained low (Clavien-Dindo I–II 8%, III 1%) with reoperation and readmission rates of 2%. R0 resection was achieved in 96% of tumors, most of which are early stage (77%). R-TAMIS appears safe and feasible for local excision of early rectal tumors, with descriptive estimates suggesting low perioperative morbidity and short hospital stay. While currently more costly than laparoscopic TAMIS, efficiency gains in high-volume centers may mitigate costs. Further prospective studies are needed to better define outcomes and refine procedural indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.