ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2026
Evaluation of Clinical Practice Guidelines on Timing and Onset of Labour in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Scoping Review.
Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is the most common pregnancy complication globally, yet recommendations for the timing and onset of labour vary. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) aim to improve safety and quality by guiding decision making through evidence-based recommendations.
objectivesScoping review with embedded guideline appraisal to assess the consistency of recommendations regarding the timing and onset of labour for women with GDM and whether variation was associated with guideline quality. SEARCH STRATEGY: Databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EBSCO, Scopus, Embase, JBI Guidelines) and websites of relevant professional organisations were searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Guidelines and consensus statements published from 2015 to January 2025, available in English from high-income countries, were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Guideline quality was assessed using the AGREE-II tool, and recommendations were analysed descriptively. MAIN
resultsOf 1422 records screened, 24 CPGs met the inclusion criteria. The quality of the included CPGs varied, with inconsistent applicability and stakeholder involvement (mean AGREE-II domain scores 55%), developmental rigour (43%), and editorial independence (37%). On the basis of the AGREE-II scores, only 3 CPGs were recommended for use without modifications. Even among higher quality guidelines, recommendations for the onset and timing of labour varied, from 37 to 40+ 6 weeks.
conclusionsConsiderable variation exists with regard to the quality of CPGs and recommendations about the timing of birth for women with GDM. These findings highlight the importance of shared decision making and the need for further research to assist women and their maternity care providers in discussing optimal birth timing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.