ArticleThe Lancet. Microbe2026
Bedaquiline resistance in patients with Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra-tested rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in the Western Cape, South Africa: a prospective study.
Article in The Lancet. Microbe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- No phenotypic resistance observed for most group-3 and -4 variants inMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Integrating resistance biology, virulence networks, and precision therapeutics against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Infection · 2026Review
- Epidemiological Characteristics and Spatiotemporal Cluster Analysis of Multidrug-Resistant and Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis Among Older People - China, 2019-2025.China CDC weekly · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the GenoScreen Deeplex Myc-TB workflow for drug-resistant tuberculosis testing in South Africa.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBedaquiline-containing regimens have been widely used to treat patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa since 2019. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of bedaquiline resistance among patients in the Western Cape with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis tested by Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert).
methodsThis prospective study analysed consecutive Mycobacterium tuberculosis diagnostic isolates collected from patients with Xpert-tested rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in the Western Cape, South Africa, between March 30, 2023, and Jan 3, 2024. We used the Deeplex Myc-TB assay within routine clinical workflows to test genotypic resistance to bedaquiline and other antituberculosis drugs; mmpR5 variants were classified according to Deeplex version 3.0.1 extended catalogue. Phenotypic drug susceptibility information was derived from the National Health Laboratory System and Stellenbosch University for isolates with a Deeplex-identified mmpR5 variant. We estimated the prevalence of bedaquiline resistance and the diagnostic accuracy of Deeplex for bedaquiline susceptibility using a composite genotypic-phenotypic reference standard.
findingsOf 701 sputum sediments, 131 (19%) were culture-negative. Of the 570 isolates accumulated during the study period, Deeplex was not performed for 139 during intervals trialling workflow optimisation procedures. Of 431 isolates, we successfully sequenced 401 (93%), of which 15 (4%) were found to be rifampicin-susceptible; 364 (91%) analysed isolates were baseline and 37 (9%) were longitudinal (median estimated time since previous diagnosis of 5·4 months [IQR 3·7-8·0]). Bedaquiline resistance was detected in 45 (12% [95% CI 9-16]) of 364 baseline and 15 (41% [25-58]) of 37 longitudinal isolates. Deeplex-tested resistance-associated and uncharacterised mmpR5 variants had a similar likelihood of being phenotypic drug susceptibility testing-resistant (37 [97%] of 38 and 16 [94%] of 17, respectively; p=0·53). Combining both types of variants, Deeplex had a sensitivity of 93% (95% CI 83-98) and specificity of 99% (97-100).
interpretationIn a prospective, representative sample of patients with Xpert-tested rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis, we found an elevated prevalence of bedaquiline resistance, particularly in patients with recent tuberculosis treatment. Efficient and accurate surveillance for bedaquiline resistance should be a high programmatic priority.
fundingThe National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (at the National Institutes of Health) and Unitaid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.