ArticleJournal of applied toxicology : JAT2026
Respiratory Support as a Source of Plasticizer Exposure in Premature Neonates.
Article in Journal of applied toxicology : JAT, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the neonatal intensive care unit, premature neonates often are in need of respiratory support, which is provided via several plastic medical devices (PMDs). These devices can be a potential source of plasticizers (phthalates and alternative plasticizers [APs]), which increase the flexibility and durability of PMDs. The aim of this study was to investigate the contribution of respiratory support as a source of plasticizer exposure in neonates by analyzing the concentrations of nine phthalates and 11 APs in nine PMDs commonly used for invasive and noninvasive respiratory support administration using LC-MS/MS and GC-MS. Additionally, a pilot ex vivo experiment mimicking mechanical ventilation was set up to assess plasticizer content in breath condensate. First, we showed that tris-(2-ethylhexyl) trimellitate (TOTM), di-(2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate, and di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) are present in relevant amounts in PMDs used for respiratory support. Breath condensate collected after circulation through a ventilation circuit with three different endotracheal tubes containing either TOTM, DEHP, or no significant plasticizers all showed substantial concentrations for DEHP and diethyl phthalate. This work provides novel evidence that respiratory medical devices used in neonatal intensive care units can be a significant source of plasticizer exposure, and introduces an ex vivo leaching model that simulates in vivo ventilation conditions to assess clinical migration behavior of both phthalate and alternative plasticizers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.