ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2026
Screening and validation of potential molecular markers for colorectal cancer: based on bioinformatics analysis and machine learning.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal Cancer (CRC) exhibits persistently high incidence and mortality rates worldwide, imposing a substantial socioeconomic burden. Early screening, early diagnosis, and early treatment can significantly improve patients’ survival rates while reducing mortality. However, there remains a lack of effective biomarkers to aid in early screening and diagnosis. As a branch of artificial intelligence, machine learning can automatically analyze large volumes of data, greatly saving human time and resources. The advancement of high-throughput sequencing technology has provided researchers with abundant gene expression data, offering rich data resources for the training and validation of machine learning models. With the development of artificial intelligence, integrating knowledge from bioinformatics, machine learning, molecular biology, and clinical medicine for analysis enables a more comprehensive understanding and exploration of the molecular biological mechanisms underlying CRC. In summary, this project aims to utilize machine learning techniques to screen five CRC signature genes (ABCG2, SCGN, USP2, CLDN1, and EPHX4) from GEO datasets, validate these signature genes using TCGA database, and perform RT-qPCR to detect the relative mRNA expression levels of these genes in CRC. Ultimately, this study seeks to provide novel biomolecular markers for the early diagnosis of CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.