Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41723754›Full record

ReviewDiscover oncology2026

Overcoming domain-specific challenges for artificial intelligence in abdominal oncology toward clinical translation.

Boshi Duan, Xue Bai, Tianzuo Wang, Tianyou Wang, Xiao Hu, Shupei Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Boshi Duan *Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Xue Bai *Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Tianzuo Wang *, Shenyang No.126 Middle School, Shenyang, China.
Tianyou Wang *, Shenyang No.126 Middle School, Shenyang, China.
Xiao HuRespiratory Medicine Department, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China. hux@hku-szh.org.
Shupei LiDepartment of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China. lishupei333@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is advancing clinical oncology, yet its application to abdominal tumors presents distinct challenges compared to other cancer types. This review analyzes the role of machine intelligence specifically in abdominal oncology, focusing on its scope in detection, diagnosis, and treatment optimization. We find that AI systems, particularly computer-aided detection (CAD) and diagnosis (CADx), demonstrate high performance in tumor identification and characterization. Furthermore, radiomics powered by these computational tools can non-invasively predict molecular profiles, aiding personalized therapy. However, key challenges—including data heterogeneity, model generalizability, ethical concerns, and regulatory gaps—hinder robust clinical integration. This review synthesizes current applications, critically examines domain-specific limitations, and proposes a framework for translating AI advancements into improved clinical management of abdominal tumors. Future directions to bridge this translational gap include privacy-preserving federated learning, explainable AI for clinical trust, and rigorous multi-center validation.

Indexed as

Abdominal tumorsArtificial intelligenceDeep learningFederated learningRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID41723754
PMCPMC13031623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.