ArticleHuman genomics2026
Identification of miRNA biomarkers and development of predictive signatures for early detection and prognosis in cervical precancer and cancer.
Article in Human genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAberrant microRNA expression has been implicated in cervical carcinogenesis, making miRNAs promising biomarkers for early detection and risk stratification of cervical precancer and cancer. This study aimed to identify and validate miRNA expression profiles and signatures that distinguish benign, precancer, and cancer cervical tissues, providing insights into their potential utility in cervical cancer screening and diagnosis.
methodsWe analyzed miRNA expression from archival FFPE cervical tissues of 272 women (100 benign, 89 precancer, 83 invasive cancer) using next-generation sequencing. Differential expression was assessed using DESeq2 with significant miRNAs defined by an absolute log2 fold change ≥ 1 and an adjusted p-value < 0.05. Functional enrichment of miRNA targets was performed using multiMiR and DAVID, and protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks were constructed using STRING and Cytoscape. Machine learning classifiers were developed with recursive feature elimination (RFE) and XGBoost and evaluated in internal and external cohorts. miRNA signatures were further assessed for association with overall survival in the TCGA cervical cancer cohort using multivariable Cox regression models.
resultsNotably, hsa-miR-1246 was the most significant miRNA in cancer vs. benign (log₂FC = 5.58, p = 3.20 × 10⁻41) and cancer vs. precancer (log₂FC = 4.89, p = 5.23 × 10⁻33). hsa-miR-149-5p was most significant in benign vs. precancer (log₂FC = −1.48, p = 1.53 × 10⁻¹⁴). Enrichment analyses highlighted cancer-related pathways with hub genes including TP53, BCL2, STAT3, ESR1, and MYC. RFE with XGBoost identified a 26-miRNA panel for multiclass classification and a 4-miRNA panel for binary cancer vs. benign classification. The binary model achieved strong performance with an AUC of 0.97 and 0.91 in internal and external validation sets respectively. Both the 26-miRNA (p < 0.001) and 4-miRNA (p = 0.01) signatures were associated with poorer overall survival.
conclusionOur findings identify distinct miRNAs and miRNA-based signatures that differentiate benign, precancer, and cancer cervical tissues, highlighting their potential clinical utility as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Furthermore, the development of compact, biologically interpretable miRNA signatures demonstrates strong promise as robust classifiers for early cancer detection and tissue characterization, with possible therapeutic relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.