ArticlePorcine health management2026
Uncovering biosecurity gaps: risk factors for PRRSV seropositivity in Costa Rican pig farms identified through machine learning.
Article in Porcine health management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPorcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) continues to impose significant economic losses on pig production globally. In Costa Rica, where the virus is endemic, there is limited knowledge of the farm-level risk factors influencing PRRSV spread. This study aimed to identify biosecurity factors associated with PRRSV seroprevalence in Costa Rican pig farms.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted on 21 pig farms across Costa Rica. Data on farm management and biosecurity practices were collected using a structured questionnaire and linked to PRRSV seroprevalence data from a companion study. Logistic regression, and machine learning methods like LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator), and Random Forest models were used to identify significant risk factors associated with herd-level PRRSV positivity.
resultsThree key risk factors were consistently identified by both LASSO and Random Forest models: historical controlled exposure to PRRSV, restrictions on employee access to the farm, and restrictions on employee visits to other pig farms. Additional risk factors identified included topography, disinfection practices for transport vehicles, sanitation measures for visitors, boot and clothing protocols, and feedback procedures. Farms with a history of controlled exposure had an odds ratio of 90 (95% CI: 7.6–3,550) for being PRRSV-positive.
conclusionThe findings underscore the importance of internal and external biosecurity measures, particularly in relation to personnel movement and intentional exposure practices. Modeling approaches such as LASSO and Random Forest provided complementary insights into PRRSV risk factors in a tropical production setting. These insights can guide tailored interventions to reduce PRRSV transmission in Costa Rica and similar regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.