ArticleBMC research notes2026
Perspectives from Sri Lankan physicians on current approaches to diagnosing and managing lower respiratory tract infections.
Article in BMC research notes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesLower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) pose significant diagnostic challenges, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where access to diagnostics and clinical tools is limited. This qualitative study explored Sri Lankan physicians’ attitudes and practices regarding current approaches to diagnosing and managing LRTIs in adult patients.
resultsWe interviewed fifteen internal medicine physicians from six public hospitals throughout Sri Lanka. Participants’ management of LRTIs primarily depended on clinical history, basic investigations such as white blood cell count, and clinical judgment and experience. Guidelines (e.g., from the Sri Lankan College of Microbiologists and British Thoracic Society) were consulted, but physicians reported deviations when faced with drug unavailability or severe LRTI cases. Use of rapid pathogen-based diagnostics was limited given resource constraints. The biomarker test C-reactive protein (CRP) was used commonly, while the biomarker test procalcitonin (PCT) was used rarely due to high cost and limited access. Physicians frequently used clinical decision support tools (CDSTs), including CURB-65 and the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI), on their mobile phones for determining severity of LRTI. Overall, physicians relied on a combination of clinical judgment and CDSTs, with selective use of guidelines and rapid diagnostics, in managing LRTIs. These results can help inform the development of strategies for improving the diagnosis and management of LRTIs in Sri Lanka.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.