ReviewPerioperative medicine (London, England)2026
Perioperative anesthesia management of GLP-1 receptor agonists: a systematic review of potential risks.
Review in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) were initially developed for the management of type 2 diabetes, due to their role in enhancing insulin secretion, decreasing glucagon secretion, and delaying gastric emptying. Although these mechanisms have been exploited to facilitate weight loss, these medications have also been indicated for patients with cardiovascular or renal diseases, all of which have caused a recent drastic rise in prescribing GLP-1 RAs. However, the current American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) guidelines express concerns of an increased risk of aspiration in the perioperative setting due to the well-documented delayed gastric emptying. This systematic review evaluates the literature on the relationship between GLP-1 RA use and increased regurgitation and aspiration events to contextualize the existing, consensus-based guidelines put forth by the ASA in light of limited comparative evidence. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, SCOPUS, MEDLINE, and EMBASE from inception to January 17, 2025, yielding over 1.3 million articles. After a PRISMA analysis was completed on the initial search and articles were screened based on predefined eligibility criteria, 32 articles were selected for review and analysis. Although most of the studies reported an association between GLP-1 RA and increased residual gastric contents, evidence linking these medications to a statistically significant rise in regurgitation or aspiration events remains highly inconsistent. The variability in available studies, potential confounding factors, and the severe heterogeneity of conclusions all emphasize the need for more high-quality evidence-based primary research to optimize perioperative management of patients taking GLP-1 RAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.