ArticleJournal of neuroinflammation2026
CNS-targeted NLRP3 Inhibition by NT-0527 confers therapeutic advantage in a CAPS mouse model.
Article in Journal of neuroinflammation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome is a key mediator of innate immune responses which functions to facilitate production of inflammatory cytokines Interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18 and pyroptotic cell death; dysregulated NLRP3 activation contributes to a wide range of inflammatory diseases. Gain-of-function (GoF) mutations in the NLRP3 gene underlie cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes (CAPS), a spectrum of rare autoinflammatory disorders characterized by both systemic and central nervous system (CNS) involvement. The hD305N mutant CAPS mouse model recapitulates these human disease features, including spontaneous peripheral and CNS manifestations, making it a powerful tool for evaluating the effectiveness of NLRP3 inhibitors. Here, we use this model to compare blood-brain barrier-penetrant NT-0527 and non-penetrant CP-456,773 inhibitors for their ability to provide therapeutic benefit within peripheral and central compartments and to address the question of whether CNS anti-inflammatory outcomes are enhanced by access of an NLRP3 inhibitor to the local tissue environment.
resultsThe two inhibitors possess similar in vitro pharmacological profiles and effectively inhibited NLRP3 function in vivo following acute LPS challenge of hD305N mice. Moreover, when administered therapeutically, the individual inhibitors reduced peripheral inflammatory biomarkers attendant to IL-1β output resulting from hyperactivity of the hD305N GoF NLRP3 mutein. Peripheral pharmacological impact included direct evidence of NLRP3 target engagement assessed as a reduction in levels of mature IL-1β recovered in tissue homogenates. In sharp contrast, NT-0527 but not CP-456,773 mitigated CNS inflammation as evidenced by normalized expression of a panel of inflammatory genes and reduced accumulation of myeloid cells in brains of hD305N CAPS mice. In line with this differential impact, NT-0527 treatment reduced levels of mature IL-1β recovered in hD305N brain homogenates demonstrating CNS-centric target engagement while CP-456,773 treatment did not. Notably, CP-456,773 reduced inflammatory cell accumulation in the adjacent dura mater, which lies outside the blood–brain and blood–CSF barriers.
conclusionsThese findings highlight the importance of locally generated IL-1β in driving CNS disease manifestations in a mouse CAPS model, and demonstrate a clear therapeutic advantage for a BBB-penetrant NLRP3 inhibitor in mitigating inflammatory outcomes within the central compartment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.