ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
Field-based tests for assessing motor abilities in young volleyball players: normative values and age group differences.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this cross-sectional study was to establish age and sex-specific normative values for strength, power, agility and flexibility assessed by field-based tests in young volleyball players aged 10–18 years who were actively training and competing in volleyball, and to examine differences across age groups. The sample consisted of 3,337 boys and girls aged 10 to 18 years. All participants were actively involved in volleyball. The following field-based tests were applied: Standing Long Jump (SLJ), Standing Medicine Overhead Throw (SMOT), Modified X Test (X test), Sit and Reach (SR), and Shoulder Stick Test (SST). To establish normative values for field-based tests assessing motor abilities in young volleyball players and to determine age group differences, basic descriptive statistics (Mean, SD), along with one-way MANOVA and ANOVA, were used. Significant differences were observed across all implemented motor ability tests in both males and females (ANOVA: F = 106.9, p < 0.001, η² = 0.353, on average), except for the SST test in females. Overall, performance in strength, power, and agility tests improved with increasing age, whereas flexibility showed smaller or more stable age-related changes, particularly in girls. These results reflect the interplay between biological maturation, volleyball-specific demands and training exposure. The normative data provided may offer useful reference values for contextualizing physical development in youth volleyball within long-term athlete development frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.