ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2026
Association between coronary artery calcium scores and retinal ischemic perivascular lesions.
Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCoronary artery calcium (CAC) scores measure atherosclerosis and are associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Retinal ischemic perivascular lesions (RIPLs) represent focal retinal infarcts and have been linked to systemic CVD. Given their association with retinal microcirculation dysfunction, RIPLs might serve as early indicators of systemic vascular dysfunction. This study aims to assess the relationship between CAC scores and RIPLs.
methodsRetrospective, single-institution, cross-sectional study. Patients consenting for research who had both high-quality, bilateral, macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging and a CAC score of either 0 (low risk) or ≥ 300 (high risk) within one year after their macular OCT imaging. RIPLs were identified as regions of focal inner nuclear layer (INL) thinning, outer plexiform layer (OPL) inward deviation, and outer nuclear layer (ONL) expansion on OCT B-scans in the absence of underlying or overlying retinal pathology. The difference in mean total RIPLs per patient between the high- and low-risk groups was assessed. The percentages of individuals in each group with high RIPL count (≥ 2) were compared as well. The effects of potential confounders (known cardiovascular risk factors) on the relationship between RIPL counts and CAC-score-based risk group were examined with multivariate analysis.
results90 patients (low-risk: 66; high-risk: 24) were included. High-risk patients were older (mean ± std of 72.1y ± 7.7 vs. 62.1y ± 10.5; p < 0.001), more likely male (46% vs. 17%; p = 0.004), and were more likely to have hypertension (79% vs. 30%; p < 0.001), type 2 diabetes mellitus (38% vs. 9%; p = 0.003), smoking history (62% vs. 22%; p = 0.021), atrial fibrillation (17% vs. 0%; p = 0.004), and lower total cholesterol (155.2 mg/dL ± 36.3 vs. 201.0 mg/dL ± 41.2; p < 0.001). Increased raw RIPL counts (5.29 ± 7.54 vs. 2.36 ± 3.52; p = 0.008) and increased probability of elevated RIPL presence (75% with ≥ 2 RIPLs vs. 48%; p = 0.025) were observed in high-risk patients.
conclusionsCAC score ≥ 300 is associated with an increased number of RIPLs and an increased probability of elevated RIPL presence (≥ 2 RIPLs), potentially mediated by known CVD risk factors. RIPLs might identify those with elevated CVD risk, and RIPLs might suggest presence of established CVD risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.