ArticleBMC health services research2026
Workplace violence against healthcare workers: a scoping review of reporting practices, barriers to reporting and institutional responses (2020-2025).
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rethinking violence prevention in elderly and special needs care: requirements for digital solutions.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Associations between perceived organizational support, workplace violence, and employee outcomes: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Joint latent profiles of workplace violence and burnout among healthcare workers and their associated factors: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundViolence against healthcare workers (HCWs) is a widespread global problem that has gained increasing attention due to its substantial impact on HCWs well-being and the quality of care they provide. This scoping review aimed to identify current reporting practices, institutional and organisational barriers to reporting violent incidents against HCWs, and critical research gaps in this area, integrating global evidence with a specific focus on Portugal.
methodsFollowing the methodological framework of Arksey and O’Malley (2005), refined by Levac et al. (2010), and reported per PRISMA-ScR (2018) guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (January 2020–June 2025). Studies in English, Portuguese, or Spanish addressing reporting practices, barriers to reporting, digital platforms, or policies regarding WPV against HCWs were included. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data using a structured matrix, resolving discrepancies by consensus. Results were summarized narratively with frequency analysis.
resultsFrom the initial 232 records, 35 studies met inclusion criteria, from 19 geographic areas across 5 continents. Most studies originated from Asia and Europe. Verbal violence was the most frequently reported form (20–91%), and over half reported underreporting rates exceeding 50%. The most frequently reported individual barrier was the belief that reporting is ineffective (60%), while the most cited systemic barrier was ineffective reporting systems (63%). National digital platforms reporting included the WVIRS system (California), the Synergic system (Sweden), the White Code system (Turkey), and the NOTIFICA, SAGRIS and HER+ systems (Portugal). Effective strategies to reporting combined staff training with awareness campaigns, supported by leadership engagement and policy frameworks. The COVID-19 pandemic intensified workplace tensions and may have influenced both the occurrence and reporting of violent incidents.
conclusionUnderreporting of workplace violence persists despite the existence of policies and reporting platforms. This review highlights persistent barriers to reporting workplace violence among HCWs and emphasizes the need for user-friendly and supportive reporting systems. Findings call for institutional accountability, better feedback mechanisms, and targeted policies to foster a culture of safety and transparency, both globally and in Portugal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.