ArticleBMC medicine2026
Is liquid biopsy a cost-effective method to diagnose Burkitt Lymphoma in children and young adults? A health economic evaluation in Tanzania.
Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBurkitt Lymphoma (BL) is a prevalent and highly aggressive childhood cancer in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Outcomes are poor, due in part to delays or inaccuracies in diagnosis. Liquid biopsy (sequencing circulating tumour DNA from blood) is an alternative approach that is non-invasive and offers potential for a highly specific, rapid diagnosis, which could improve outcomes through earlier access to correct treatment. Diagnosis by liquid biopsy has undergone validation in SSA. However, evidence on its economic value is needed, especially in limited-resource settings. We present a cost-utility analysis comparing liquid biopsy with conventional local histopathology for the diagnosis of paediatric BL in Tanzania.
methodsA cost-utility model was constructed to compare the costs and effects of the alternative diagnostic approaches from a Tanzanian healthcare provider perspective, over a lifetime horizon. For the liquid biopsy, we assumed testing at the patient's first contact with healthcare, resulting in earlier diagnosis. Resource use and outcome data were taken from the Aggressive Infection-Related East Africa Lymphoma study. Health outcomes were measured in Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs). Costs and outcomes were discounted at 5%. Probabilistic and univariate sensitivity analyses and scenario analysis were conducted.
resultsDiagnosis by liquid biopsy results in a reduced burden of 9.4 DALYs per patient compared to 10.5 for histopathology (difference 1.11 DALYs, 95% confidence interval 0.13-2.06), and per-patient costs are $1978 higher (95% CI $1299-2840), due to greater diagnosis costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) is $1778 per DALY averted. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicates that liquid biopsy is more likely to be cost-effective than pathology, at any threshold above $1890/DALY averted. The ICER is sensitive to assumptions regarding the extent of disease advancement at the earlier diagnosis, and to discount rate and diagnosis costs.
conclusionsDiagnosis by liquid biopsy could be cost-effective when used to accelerate diagnosis of BL in children and young adults in Tanzania, depending on when it is implemented in the patient journey, model assumptions and the decision threshold chosen.
trial registrationPan African Clinical Trials Registry: PACTR202204822312651, registered on 14th April 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.