Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41723474›Full record

ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2026

Epidemiological and economic impact of pre-exposure prophylaxis with targeted immunotherapies for COVID-19 among immunosuppressed patients in Argentina.

Carolina Moreno-López, Federico Rodríguez Cairoli, Rosario Luxardo, Federico Augustovski, Natalia Espinola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carolina Moreno-LópezDepartment of Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina. carolina.morenoudea@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4622-1063
Federico Rodríguez CairoliDepartment of Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3029-4439
Rosario LuxardoDepartment of Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Federico AugustovskiDepartment of Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2914-5022
Natalia EspinolaDepartment of Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome immunosuppressive disorders have shown substantially lower protection after COVID-19 vaccination against severe outcomes. Therefore, pre-exposure prophylaxis is proposed. Targeted immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies represents an option for preventing severe COVID-19. However, there is a lack of epidemiological and economic information on pre-exposure prophylaxis with targeted immunotherapies against COVID-19 among immunosuppressed patients. Thus, this study aims to identify and estimate the size of target population and direct medical costs related to pre-exposure prophylaxis with targeted immunotherapies against COVID-19 among the immunosuppressed adult population, and to explore the short-term economic impact of introducing tixagevimab–cilgavimab (AZD7442) for pre-exposure prophylaxis from the social security perspective in Argentina. This perspective was chosen due to the broad coverage of Argentina’s social security system, ensuring a representative framework for cost and access analysis.

methodsThrough a four-step approach, we: 1) identified the immunosuppressed adult potential target population that could be eligible for pre-exposure prophylaxis with targeted immunotherapies in Argentina; 2) estimated direct medical costs associated with pre-exposure prophylaxis and COVID-19 management using a micro-costing approach; and 3) explore a cost analysis for the case of tixagevimab–cilgavimab 600 mg (assuming an ex-factory price of $950 per pack) from the social security perspective in Argentina, considering 0% and 100% pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake scenarios. Costs were expressed in American dollars ($) as of November 2022 (exchange rate: 130.8 Argentinian pesos = 1 American dollar).

resultsWe estimated that 12,788 patients with target conditions (approximately 40 per 100,000 adults) would be candidates for receiving this therapy in Argentina. In terms of costs, the 100% uptake scenario accounts for total annual savings of approximately $ 121,902.7 in outpatient and hospitalization COVID-19-related costs. Also, tixagevimab–cilgavimab acquisition and administration costs represented an annual incremental cost of $24,415,617 ($1,918.5 per patient year). Finally, the net cost difference between the 100% and 0% uptake scenarios were estimated at $24,254,732.3 ($1,896.6 per patient year).

conclusionThis study provides crucial information for local and regional decision-makers to guide informed assessment of a potential coverage of pre-exposure prophylaxis with targeted immunotherapy among the immunosuppressed population.

Indexed as

ArgentinaBudget impact analysisCOVID-19ImmunosuppressionPre-exposure prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID41723474
PMCPMC13032603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.