ArticleBMC medical education2026
Case-based in-person teaching improves self-directed mastery of the MDS-UPDRS motor scoring.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to evaluate a novel integrated teaching model for learning the Movement Disorder Society–Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale Part III (MDS-UPDRS-III). The model combines self-directed video learning with case-based, in-person teaching.
methodsA total of 23 non-expertise neurology residents from Peking Union Medical College Hospital participated the study. The training program comprised four stages: video-based self-learning, a pre-training assessment (Case 1), expert-led offline instruction with case analysis, and a post-training assessment (Case 2). The rating accuracy and scoring errors for individual items were compared before and after the training. A subgroup analyses was conducted to assess the learning outcomes among physicians at different levels.
resultsThe total scoring error decreased significantly after training (median score reduced from 13 to 12, P = 0.002). Significant improvements were observed in the accuracy of non-tremor items, such as speech, postural stability, and freezing of gait (p < 0.05), while the accuracy of certain tremor items declined due to increased case difficulty. Subgroup analysis indicated that participants with little or no prior MDS-UPDRS assessment experience, and junior physicians with 1–5 years of work experience demonstrated the most significant reduction in scoring errors (p < 0.05). In contrast, senior or highly experienced physicians showed no substantial improvement.
conclusionsThe novel integrated teaching model that comprising self-directed video learning and case-based in-person sessions, enhances non-expertise neurology residents’ competency in MDS-UPDRS-III scoring. This approach is particularly beneficial for less experienced clinicians, allowing them to quickly master the scale, and has significant potential for widespread application in neurology training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.