ArticleBMC public health2026
Key factors in developing effective digital health promotion tools for cancer prevention and health behavior change in adolescence through a multi-country survey.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPrimary cancer prevention through behavior change in adolescence, a crucial period for shaping lifelong health habits, presents a major public health challenge across Europe. Addressing this, the SUNRISE project aims to tackle the challenge of primary cancer prevention in adolescents by developing and implementing an innovative, digitally-enhanced life-skills program tailored to diverse socio-economic, cultural, and environmental backgrounds by incorporating various Digital Health Promotion (DHP) tools to foster sustainable health behavior change in adolescents. The present study aims to identify key requirements and features that should be considered while developing effective DHP tools, based on a multi-stakeholder survey conducted across seven European countries.
methodsThe survey was conducted on 505 stakeholders (students, parents, and educators), from seven European countries to assess a set of key features for effective DHP tools for their importance on a five-point likert scale.
resultsOur findings revealed that seven of the proposed DHP tools’ features were identified as important considering all the stakeholder groups, while significant differences in the importance of certain features across different stakeholder groups and countries were identified. Students, as primary users, demonstrated distinct preferences, which often diverged from educators and parents, suggesting that stakeholders hold distinct priorities driven by their roles and contextual backgrounds. Additionally, country-level variations were notable; for example, Swiss participants rated the proposed features, in general, as of lower importance than the Spanish respondents.
conclusionsThese insights emphasize the necessity of developing adaptable and context-sensitive DHP tools that reflect the diverse needs and preferences of adolescents across Europe. The large-scale implementation and evaluation of this program will provide valuable data for shaping future digital health interventions aimed at cancer prevention in youth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.