Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41723373›Full record

ReviewThe journal of headache and pain2026

Meningeal neuropeptide and neuroimmune interactions in the context of migraine.

Talia Adi, Michael S Gold

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of headache and pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Talia AdiUniversity of Pittsburgh-Carnegie Mellon University Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Michael S GoldPittsburgh Center for Pain Research, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. msg22@pitt.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migraine is a highly prevalent, painful neurological disorder with increasing evidence to support the contribution of neuroimmune interactions to its pathophysiology. The cranial meninges are a key site of these interactions, and are characterized by rich innervation, vascular and lymphatic supply, connective tissue, and diverse immune cell populations. Migraine-related physiological events, such as cortical spreading depression and other external triggers, induce the release of neuropeptides, including calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), substance P (SP), pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), and neuropeptide Y (NPY). These neuropeptides subsequently act on immune cell subtypes to promote cytokine release, thereby driving the bidirectional relationship between meningeal immune cells and neuronal innervation. Recent therapies targeting neuropeptide signaling, particularly CGRP, have validated the importance of these systems. However, gaps remain in the understanding of how neuropeptide signaling shapes meningeal immune responses in the context of the time course of a migraine attack, where the headache phase may be preceded by a triggering event, a prodrome, and an aura, and followed by a postdrome. This review summarizes the existing literature on the effects of neuropeptide signaling on immune cells as it relates to migraine pathophysiology and highlights the gaps in knowledge that need to be addressed to better understand migraine mechanisms and inform future therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

MeningesMigraine DisordersNeuroimmunomodulationNeuropeptidesAnimalsHumansNeuropeptidesAuraHeadacheMarcrophageMast cellNeuroimmuneNociceptor sensitizationProdrome

Identifiers

PMID41723373
PMCPMC13032340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.