ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
The relationship between psychological resilience and fear of falling in older adults with fractures: a cross-sectional potential profile analysis.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis is a cross-sectional study designed to identify the latent profiles of psychological resilience in elderly patients with fracture and examine the relationship between resilience categories and fear of falling (FOF), thereby informing individualized rehabilitation strategies.
methodsA convenience sample was drawn from elderly patients admitted to the Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics at a tertiary general hospital in Beijing between September 2024 and July 2025 due to fall-related fractures. A total of 213 older adults aged 60 and above with fall-related fractures were included. Psychological resilience was assessed using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), and FOF was measured with the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) was used to identify resilience profiles. Logistic and linear regression analyses, adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, pain level, functional status, and time since fracture/surgery, were performed to explore the relationship between resilience subtypes (entered as a continuous CD-RISC score), demographic and clinical factors, and FOF levels.
resultsThe age of elderly patients with fall-related fractures was 60–98 (75.28 ± 8.73) years old, and the median age was 74 years old. Three latent resilience profiles were identified: low (33.5%), moderate (22.7%), and high (43.8%) resilience groups. Patients in the high-resilience group exhibited significantly lower FOF scores than those in the other two groups (P < 0.001). Multivariate regression revealed that social support, fracture site, use of walking aid, fall history and lower psychological resilience were significant predictors of FOF (P < 0.05). Notably, vertebral fractures were associated with the highest FOF levels (β = 9.16, P < 0.001).
conclusionsPsychological resilience is independently associated with fear of falling among elderly fracture patients, with a clear gradient across resilience profiles. Enhancing resilience, particularly in low-resilience individuals, may be a potential target for intervention, though causal inference is limited by the cross-sectional design and single-center, convenience sampling strategy. Integrating resilience assessment into clinical evaluation could support more holistic rehabilitation planning.
trial registrationChiCTR2400089221, September 4, 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.