ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026
Risk factors for blood culture contamination in a tertiary hospital: a one-year retrospective analysis.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBlood culture contamination is a significant problem that can lead to misdiagnosis, unnecessary antibiotic use, and increased workload. This study aimed to determine the blood culture contamination rates in a tertiary hospital and to evaluate the factors associated with contamination.
methodsThis retrospective descriptive study included blood culture samples collected at a tertiary hospital between January 2023 and December 2023. Cultures from patients aged ≥ 18 years were evaluated. Growth of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and other skin flora agents that were not considered clinically significant were classified as contamination. Contamination risk factors, including the sampling unit, sampling period, and healthcare personnel who collected the cultures, were evaluated.
resultsA total of 7716 blood cultures from 2388 patients were included. 11.8% of the cultures were defined as contaminated. Contamination rates were found to be significantly higher in internal medicine wards (12.5%) and intensive care units (13.5%) compared to surgical wards (3.6%) (p < 0.001). In logistic regression analysis, the risk of contamination was found to be 3 times higher in blood cultures taken from internal medicine wards and 4.1 times higher in ICUs compared to surgical wards (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Blood cultures obtained by intern doctors (sixth-year medical students) were independently associated with contamination (OR = 1.68; p < 0.001). The risk of contamination was higher in blood cultures taken between July and December (OR = 1.23; p = 0.004).
conclusionBlood culture contamination is a multifactorial problem influenced by factors such as the sampling unit and staff experience. These findings highlight the need for targeted quality improvement interventions, particularly structured training for newly rotating clinical staff. CLINICAL
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.