ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
Computational fluid dynamics analysis of the respiratory function of orthodontic patients. A scoping review.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of numerical simulation of upper airway flow field in pediatric obstructive sleep apnea with adenoid hypertrophy.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Utility of Cephalometry and Acoustic Pharyngometry for the Assessment of Moderate to Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea Before Treatment in Childhood.Nature and science of sleep · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComputational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been increasingly applied to simulate airflow behavior in the upper airway, enabling the assessment of airflow-related changes following orthodontic and orthognathic treatments that modify airway dimensions and shape. Such changes may influence ventilation and, potentially, the risk of sleep-disordered breathing. Therefore, the aim of this scoping review was to map and characterize the use of CFD to assess upper airway airflow and ventilation in orthodontic patients treated with or without orthognathic surgery.
methodsA literature search was conducted up to March 2025 in five databases: Cochrane, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. The Selection criteria were: Population: Healthy patients or patients with sleep-breathing disorders, without any age restrictions. Concept: All patients underwent orthodontic treatment, either associated with orthognathic surgery or not. Context: Articles that evaluated the upper airway airflow (nasal cavity, nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx) after orthodontic and/or orthognathic intervention, using CFD, were included. Studies that included CFD in patients diagnosed with or without Obstructive Sleep Apnea were included. Study types: randomized and non-randomized trials, analytical, and descriptive studies were included. No limitations on the year of publication or language were imposed. Articles that met eligibility criteria were assessed using the PRISMA-ScR. Data were charted and synthesized descriptively according to treatment modality, airway region assessed, imaging protocols, CFD modelling characteristics, and reported airflow outcomes.
resultsForty-three articles met the inclusion criteria. In general, CFD results have shown that treatments that could reduce the upper airway dimension, such as premolar extraction or mandibular setback surgeries, worsened the ventilation in patients. Conversely, treatments that might increase the upper airway dimension (i.e. functional appliances, rapid maxillary expansion, mandibular advancement device, maxillo-mandibular advancement surgery, and postero-superior repositioning of the maxilla) improved ventilation and possibly improved obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) signs and symptoms. Although more robust studies are needed.
conclusionThis scoping review maps the expanding application of CFD for the evaluation of upper airway airflow in orthodontic and orthognathic contexts. CFD appears to be a valuable exploratory tool for characterizing airflow patterns and identifying potential trends related to different treatment modalities. Nevertheless, due to methodological variability and limited longitudinal data, CFD findings should be interpreted descriptively. Future research should prioritize standardized imaging and CFD protocols, validation against in vivo respiratory measures, and clinically relevant outcome reporting to better define the translational role of CFD in orthodontic airway assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.