SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Prevalence, risk factors, and early prediction of refractory pneumonia caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global trends in pediatric Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia research.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a multivariate predictive model for the risk of refractory mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children based on quantitative computed tomography features.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- East Asia as a sentinel: risk-stratified corticosteroid therapy for paediatric macrolide-resistantEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Review
- Immunopathogenesis, molecular phenotyping, and host-directed interventions for severe pediatricFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (rMPP) poses significant challenges in pediatric care due to delayed recognition and limited systematic evidence. This meta-analysis evaluates the prevalence, risk factors, and predictive accuracy of models for rMPP. We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science until November 2024 for observational studies involving children aged 0-18 years with rMPP. Study quality was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa and JBI scales. Data were analyzed via R4.4.2. Fifty-three studies (n = 35,275) revealed an overall rMPP prevalence of 37.8% (95% CI 30.5-45.5%), with significant temporal variation: 33.1% pre-COVID-19, 42.0% during, and 86.5% post-pandemic. Independent risk factors included elevated lactate dehydrogenase (OR = 1.018), C-reactive protein (OR = 1.106), procalcitonin (OR = 1.825), interleukin-6 (OR = 2.440), neutrophil count (OR = 2.955), pleural effusion (OR = 4.469), mucus plugs (OR = 5.456), and older age (OR = 1.188). Eleven prediction models demonstrated high accuracy, with ROC-AUCs of 0.913 (training) and 0.895 (validation).
conclusionThe prevalence of rMPP in children is significant and has increased markedly since the COVID-19 pandemic. Key biomarkers and clinical features facilitate early risk stratification, and validated predictive models improve clinical decision-making. These findings highlight the urgent need for targeted surveillance and customized interventions for high-risk populations. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Pneumonia caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae in children can be effectively controlled by first-line macrolide therapy. • However, there is still a proportion of children who do not respond well to this treatment regimen and develop refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae due to macrolide resistance. WHAT IS NEW: • This review and meta-analysis show the incidence of refractory Mycoplasma pneumonia and its potential risk factors. • Finding the feasibility of constructing a predictive model that facilitates early prediction, to provide evidence-based evidence for further in-depth clinical understanding of this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41723336What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.