Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41723228›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

An exploratory study on shared sanitation and equity in peri-urban India.

Helen O Pitchik, Anoop Jain, Michaela Kupfer, Manoj Parida, Prabin Ghimire, Isha Ray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Helen O PitchikDivision of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. hpitchik@berkeley.edu.
Anoop JainEnvironmental Health, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Michaela KupferDivision of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Manoj ParidaDCOR Consulting, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha, India.
Prabin GhimireSanitation and Health Rights in India, Bokaro Steel City, Jharkhand, India.
Isha RayEnergy and Resources Group, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shared sanitation facilities are critical for universal access to sanitation. This exploratory study examines the role that free shared sanitation facilities play in equalizing sanitation access in peri-urban India, where, despite extensive state-led efforts towards universal access, household toilets remain infeasible for the country’s poorest citizens. We conducted one-on-one semi-structured interviews with 39 shared sanitation facility users in two peri-urban communities in Jharkhand, India. Participants were recruited after they used the sanitation facility. Data were analyzed using both deductive and inductive coding and thematic analysis. We found that clean and safe community sanitation facilities were used by people when at home, and were used both by those with and without a home toilet. We also found (consistent with previous work) that when people were outside of the home for work, school, and errands, they often needed but did not have access to usable toilets. These findings suggest why, and under what conditions, shared sanitation facilities are essential to realizing the human right to sanitation. Shared facilities are complements to, and not substitutes for, household facilities. Global sanitation targets, therefore, should be modified to reflect the role of well-maintained shared sanitation in meeting the goal of universal access.

Indexed as

SanitationToilet FacilitiesFamily CharacteristicsHumansIndiaUrban PopulationJoint monitoring programPeri-urban IndiaSanitation ladderShared sanitationUniversal sanitation access

Identifiers

PMID41723228
PMCPMC13043708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.