ArticleScientific reports2026
Lower-limb joint-coordination and coordination variability during lateral shuffle in colleague students with different vision acuity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vision serves as a crucial determinant influencing human posture control. However, there is a paucity of research quantifying the relationship between vision intervention and motion control. The lateral shuffle is a prevalent movement pattern in sports and a representative movement associated with sports injuries. This study systematically evaluated the effects of various visual conditions (normal vision, + 150° convex lens, and + 450° convex lens) on bilateral lower limb coordination and variability at the hip-knee and knee-ankle joints during lateral shuffle movements. This study recruited 29 male college students with normal vision, with 19 participants meeting inclusion criteria (average age 19.84 ± 0.83 years, height 176.74 ± 5.55 cm, weight 68.51 ± 12.10 kg, BMI 21.84 ± 2.56 kg/m2). Kinematic data were collected using the PN3 Pro device under various visual conditions, which were then used to compute lower-limb coordination and coordination variability via the continuous relative phase method.Data analysis was performed using SPSS 24 software, with one-way repeated measures ANOVA employed to evaluate the impact of myopia severity on coordination, with effect sizes measured by partial eta squared (ηp2). Visual interventions significantly impacted lower limb coordination, demonstrating pronounced joint function gradient effects and lateral asymmetry. Compared to hip-knee coordination, knee-ankle coordination exhibited greater sensitivity to visual interference, with effect sizes ranging from moderate to large (ηp2, 0.129–0.418). Particularly under + 450° convex lens visual conditions, the effect size (ηp2) of Left knee-ankle coordination reached 0.418, explaining up to 41.8% of variance (p < 0.05). +450° convex lens conditions significantly increased coordination variability, supporting a dose-response relationship, with knee-ankle coordination showing heightened sensitivity. Interventions for varying degrees of myopia can impact lower limb postural control during lateral movements. The alterations in lower limb coordination predominantly affect the knee and ankle joints, rendering these two areas particularly susceptible to injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.