ArticleScientific reports2026
Synergistic effects of nano SnO
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research dealt with the synthesis of both nano stannic oxide (SnO₂) and titanium dioxide (TiO₂) nanoparticles and how their addition to high-density polyethylene (HDPE) with 5 and 3%, respectively, can affect its properties from structural, mechanical, and permeability properties, besides the antibacterial activity. The possible modulation of HDPE plastic-elastic mechanical behavior was explored for each nanoparticle type and concentration. Adding 3% SnO₂ to HDPE notably improved mechanical properties in terms of toughness from 12.1 to 16.6 × 106 (J/m3), fracture strength from 1.76 to 15.29 (MPa), and impact strength from 61.1 to 69.2 (J/m2), besides increasing the ductility of HDPE via decreasing the Young’s modulus from 1.75 to 1.62 (GPa). This may be ascribed to the homogeneous distributions of nano-sized inorganic fillers. This made the HDPE have unique superior properties, making it suited for applications that need engineering designs. Similarly, adding a little amount of TiO₂ (1 wt%) improved attributes like toughness to 12.30 × 106 (J/m3) and fracture strength to 11.29 (MPa), impact strength to 63.1 (J/m2). The observed changes in the tested mechanical properties were influenced by filler dispersion, interfacial interaction between matrix and nano-filler, and matrix restriction mechanisms. On the contrary, high TiO2 filler loading (3% wt.) resulted in agglomeration and interfacial structural defects, leading to deterioration of the HDPE’s mechanical properties. The enhanced properties of the HDPE-nano SnO₂ composites encouraged the production of films of these compositions to study their water vapor and Oxygen permeabilities, besides the antibacterial activity. Increasing nano SnO2 percentage in HDPE matrix enhanced antibacterial functioning against both E. coli and MRSA, as mirrored by larger inhibition zones and lower obtained MIC values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.